Bloomberg details the massive victory of the Democratic Party of Japan:
Hatoyama, 62, led the DPJ to win 308 seats yesterday in the 480-seat lower house, public broadcaster NHK said, ousting the party that ruled Japan for all but 10 months since 1955. The DPJ gained control of the upper house two years ago.And the reason for the change:
Voters have given Hatoyama a mandate to switch priorities from aiding the companies that built Japan’s $4.9 trillion economy to helping families cope in a society where almost a quarter of the population will be over 65 by 2014. To encourage people to have children, the DPJ says it will increase child support and lower education costs, paying for this by slashing outlays on roads, bridges and public works.While that may indeed have positive economic implications in the long run, I'm not sure how this will transform the Japanese economy in the short-run. An economy that according to this morning's sales report shows that wholesale sales dropped 30% year over year in July (greater than June's 28.7% year over year change).
“The whole idea of people rather than concrete, and, ‘Let’s be nicer to the Japanese population,’ could be immensely positive in the long term,” said Philip Whittome, who manages Japanese stocks at Investec Asset Management in London. “The election might lead to some changes in how Japan is run in ways that are underappreciated by the foreign investment community.”
In other words, Yukio Hatoyama's honeymoon may be short:
Economic reports indicate the expansion that began last quarter may already be in danger: the jobless rate rose to a record 5.7 percent in July, factory output growth slowed and household spending dropped the most in five months. That leaves Japan “more dependent on exports that it’s ever been,” said Hugh Patrick, a professor at Columbia University in New York.Source: METI
Paul Tudor's thoughts re: Japan:
ReplyDelete"[H]e thinks that Japan is an interesting story going forward due to the lower-house elections where the Liberal Democratic Party lost. Tudor feels this will spur new investment into the country and he is not the only hedge fund manager that we've seen talking about Japan lately. This will be an interesting theme to follow as more and more managers begin to warm-up to the previously frigid investment opportunities in that country."
Remember its not what is happening now - but what is its longterm prospects.
ReplyDeleteGiven only approx 4% of Japanese residents are invested in the stock market against 40%+ for other developed countries, there appears to very big scope for increased investment funds.
High pe = bullish
Low bv historically = bullish
Change of government = bullish
good points... i guess i am a bit skeptical that cheaper education will increase the birth rate and the future of japan. this seems too super-secular for me.
ReplyDeletefor me it's a slightly shorter time frame than saying lets invest in the moon as it may be inhabited in 100 years. too far off to understand the dynamics of everything involved to make an investment.