The Big Picture with help from Mike Panzner compares the recent 3.3% GDP quarter to similar in size economic expansions:
Our question: Does this 3.3% GDP resemble in most economic data points other, similar economic expansions? Or, is this GDP data, as we have argued, merely the result of a modeling flaw?
With the help of Mike Panzner (Financial Armageddon), we looked at other periods of time when GDP was similar to the Q2 3.3% -- we used any quarter where GDP was between 3.0 - 3.5% as our range. Going back to 1959 (that's all the data available) there were 12 quarters (6.1% of the total) where GDP was greater than 3.0% and less than 3.5%. We then looked at the median Unemployment Rate, NFP (trailing 12 month change), ISM Manufacturing, CPI, PPI, Industrial Production, New Housing Starts, and Consumer Confidence.What were the results?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57512/57512eec7d811e2176813f4cdd33c7c3d316ca59" alt=""
Housing starts, payrolls, manufacturing, consumer confidence, industrial production below the median level; CPI, PPI, unemployment above the median level. All the more reason why it likely didn't pass my initial "smell test"...
Source: The Big Picture
No comments:
Post a Comment