Below is an updated chart which shows the average number of hours worked by a civilian (calculated by taking the employment to population ratio and multiplying that by the average # of hours worked per week).
Below is the year over year change in that figure.
After a slight "rebound" last month, we are now at a new all-time (since 1964) low.
Want to see the relevance of hours worked per employee? Go here.
After a slight "rebound" last month, we are now at a new all-time (since 1964) low.
It certainly is a record setting eCONomy. If we had a better money system and/or a more equitable distribution of wealth, fewer hours worked/person could be viewed as a sign of increasing societal affluence.
It seems odd that productivity is up and so many are in dire financial shape.
econ 101 shows that when you hire an additional worker, total productivity rises, but with a decreasing rate.
this is the reverse situation. a bunch of workers have been laid off, thus while total productivity is lower, productivity per employee (of those that remain) is higher
I wondered about this and plotted the YOY change in the S&P 500 versus the YOY change in # hours worked per civilian, starting in '65. There's an r-squared of .31 at a 7 month lag (S&P leads by 7 months). Kind of funky.
Jake,
ReplyDeleteAfter a slight "rebound" last month, we are now at a new all-time (since 1964) low.
It certainly is a record setting eCONomy. If we had a better money system and/or a more equitable distribution of wealth, fewer hours worked/person could be viewed as a sign of increasing societal affluence.
It seems odd that productivity is up and so many are in dire financial shape.
A picture, or in this case a graph, is worth a thousand words...
ReplyDeleteThe WSJ and the NYT and the WaPo need to start publishing these types of graphs on their front pages.
The powers that be need to get serious -- in a hurry -- about putting people back to work.
Call me Keynes. Or FDR.
productivity is just a per employee measure.
ReplyDeleteecon 101 shows that when you hire an additional worker, total productivity rises, but with a decreasing rate.
this is the reverse situation. a bunch of workers have been laid off, thus while total productivity is lower, productivity per employee (of those that remain) is higher
I wondered about this and plotted the YOY change in the S&P 500 versus the YOY change in # hours worked per civilian, starting in '65. There's an r-squared of .31 at a 7 month lag (S&P leads by 7 months). Kind of funky.
ReplyDelete